Authentic leadership and kindness

A lot has been written about authentic leadership in recent years. Human-centred, empathetic, compassionate leadership has become an expectation rather than an aspiration. Leaders are expected to understand personal context, create supportive environments and adapt their approach to the people they lead.

What often gets blurred in that conversation is the difference between authenticity and kindness - they are connected but they are not interchangeable.

Authenticity is about alignment with your own values, the degree to which your behaviour reflects what you believe in. People experience it through consistency, in how you make decisions and whether your principles hold when things become tough.

Kindness is about how that behaviour affects others. It is visible in tone, judgement, empathy and the respect you bring into any interaction.

Where both are present, trust tends to build quickly. Where one exists without the other, it shows.

If someone is naturally kind, authenticity works in their favour because care is felt as genuine. Engagement deepens and teams are more willing to stretch for leaders whose intent they trust. Where kindness is not instinctive, authenticity alone doesn't close the gap because people sense when empathy is being acted out. Leaders may use the right language but it rarely creates the same depth of connection.

Another dynamic appears in workplaces with a strong duty of care toward employees: kindness can drift so far that it begins to affect performance. Leaders become hesitant to challenge, reluctant to draw boundaries or overly-focused on accommodation at the expense of delivery, losing grip on what the organisation is there to do.

That shift can sometimes point to lack of authenticity. When leaders lean too far into being liked, they can lose clarity about where responsibility sits. In public sector settings that responsibility extends beyond the team and employer to the public services they exist to deliver. When kindness toward employees turns into avoidance of difficult decisions, it can become unkind to the communities relying on its work. It can also lead to difficult decisions looking particularly draconian when they eventually do have to be made. Leaders in that space are often managing perception rather than acting from conviction, which is where uncertainty about where to draw the line begins.

The balance is not complicated, but holding it consistently requires self-awareness. Authenticity builds trust because people know where they stand. Kindness strengthens that trust when genuine. Taken too far, kindness can dilute clarity and performance. The leaders who travel furthest tend to be those whose natural instincts already align with how modern workplaces expect people to lead, steady in who they are, respectful in how they treat others and clear about the outcomes their teams deliver.

Check out how we work with leadership teams here.